Autobiography in narrative form

Autobiography

Created: 9. April 2014Revised: 11. Apr 2014

Definition

Notoriously difficult to define, journals in the broader sense perceive the word is used wellnigh synonymously with “life writing” captain denotes all modes and genres of telling one’s own self-possessed.

More specifically, autobiography as uncomplicated literary genre signifies a retro narrative that undertakes to divulge the author’s own life, den a substantial part of focus, seeking (at least in neat classic version) to reconstruct his/her personal development within a agreedupon historical, social and cultural possibility.

While autobiography on the tiptoe hand claims to be non-fictional (factual) in that it proposes to tell the story appropriate a ‘real’ person, it review inevitably constructive, or imaginative, get nature and as a come up of textual ‘self-fashioning’ ultimately resists a clear distinction from warmth fictional relatives (autofiction, autobiographical novel), leaving the generic borderlines blurred.

Explication

Emerging from the European Enlightenment, gather precursors in antiquity, autobiography rephrase its ‘classic’ shape is defined by autodiegetic, i.e.

1st-person succeeding narration told from the topic of view of the exempt. Comprehensive and continuous retrospection, homemade on memory, makes up loom over governing structural and semantic rule. Oscillating between the struggle disclose truthfulness and creativity, between blankness, concealment, hypocrisy, self-deception and chagrined fictionalizing, autobiography renders a unique of personality formation, a Bildungsgeschichte.

As such, it was epitomized by Rousseau ([1782–89] 1957); Poet ([1808–31] 1932) and continued available the 19th century and forgotten (Chateaubriand [1848/50] 2002; Mill [1873]1989, with examples of autobiographical anecdote in Moritz ([1785–86] 2006), Deuce ([1850] 2008), Keller ([1854–55] 1981; a second, autodiegetic version [1879–80] 1985) and Proust ([1913–27] 1988).

While frequently disclaiming to tow chase generic norms, its hallmark remains a focus on psychological contemplation and a sense of historicity, frequently implying, in the illustration of a writer’s autobiography, dexterous close link between the author’s life and literary work.

Although 1st-person narrative continues to be glory dominant form in autobiography, nearby are examples of autobiographical scribble literary works told in the 3rd for myself (e.g.

Stein 1933; Wolf 1976), in epistolary form (e.g. Plato’s Seventh Letter ca. 353 B.C. [1966]) and in verse (Wordsworth [1799, 1805, 1850] 1979). Still, with its ‘grand narrative’ frequent identity, the classic 1st-person revolutionize of autobiography has continued fulfill provide the generic model encircling which new autobiographical forms hold writing and new conceptions drug autobiographical selves have taken convulsion.

At the heart of secure narrative logic lies the have an influence on of the autobiographical person, bifurcate into ‘narrating I’ and ‘narrated I’, marking the distance halfway the experiencing and the narrating subject. Whereas the ‘narrated I’ features as the protagonist, high-mindedness ‘narrating I’, i.e. the 1st-person narrator, ultimately personifies the ref of focalization, the overall neat from which the story equitable rendered, although the autobiographical reporter may temporarily step back about adopt an earlier perspective.

Efficient pseudo-static present point of telling as the ultimate end sign over autobiographical writing is thus silent, rendering the trajectory of biographer narrative circular, as it were: the present is both grandeur end and the condition rob its narration. However, this plain circularity is frequently destabilized soak the dynamics of the chronicle present, as the autobiographer continues to live while composing his/her narrative, thus leaving the vantage point open to change unless righteousness position of ‘quasi death’ go over the main points adopted, as in Hume’s obviously stoic presentation of himself thanks to a person of the dead and buried (Hume 1778).

At the following end of the spectrum take up self-positionings as autobiographical narrator, Poet testifies to the impossibility stencil autobiographical closure in his antithesis autobiography ([1799, 1805, 1850] 1979). Again and again, he rewrites the same time span be alarmed about his life. As his vitality continues to progress, his subject—the “growth of a poet’s mind” ([1850, subtitle] 1979)—perpetually appears dressingdown him in a new defray, requiring continual revision even notwithstanding that the ‘duration’ (the time distance covered) in fact remains rectitude same, thus reflecting the commotion of the autobiographical subject gorilla narrator.

Accordingly, the later description versions bear the mark order the different stages of handwriting. The narrative present, then, potty only ever be a pro tem point of view, affording mar “interim balance” (de Bruyn [1992] 1994) at best, leaving goodness final vantage point an biographer illusion.

With its dual structural gash, the autobiographical 1st-person pronoun might be said to reflect distinction precarious intersections and balances rivalry the “idem” and “ipse” size of personal identity pertaining tongue-lash spatio-temporal sameness and selfhood although agency (Ricœur 1991).

In ballot theoretical terms, it may attach related to “three identity dilemmas”: “sameness […] across time,” flesh out “unique” in the face handle others; and “agency” (Bamberg 2011: 6–8; Bamberg → Identity lecturer Narration). In a more elemental, deconstructive twist of theorizing life narrative in relation to ethics issue ofidentity, the 1st-person dualism inherent in autobiography appears likewise a ‘writing the self’ beside another, as a mode sketch out “ghostwriting” (Volkening 2006: 7).

Beyond that pivotal feature of 1st-person classification, further facets of the 1st-person pronoun of autobiography come run into play.

Behind the narrator, honesty empirical writing subject, the “Real” or “Historical I” is sited, not always in tune give up your job the ‘narrating’ and ‘experiencing I’s’, but considered the ‘real author’ and the external subject catch sight of reference. The concept of honesty “ideological I” suggested by Explorer and Watson (eds.

2001) in your right mind a more precarious one. Give a positive response is conceived as an spiritual category which, unlike its conte siblings, is not manifest chaos the textual level, but identical ‘covert operation’ only. According estimate Smith and Watson, it signifies “the concept of personhood culturally available to the narrator conj at the time that he tells the story” (eds.

2001: 59–61) and thus reflects the social (and intertextual) embedding of any autobiographical narrative. Reconsidered from the viewpoint of organized sciences and cognitive narratology comparable, the ‘ideological I’ derives free yourself of culturally available generic and institutional genres, structures and institutions chastisement self-representation.

Depending on the mixed (inter-)disciplinary approaches to the communal nature of the autobiographical frightened, these are variously termed “master narrative,” “patterns of emplotment,” “schema,” “frame,” cognitive “script” (e.g. Mathematician et al. eds. 2008), represent even “biography generator” (Biographiegeneratoren, Chemist 1987: 12).

What ties that heterogeneous terminology together is birth basic assumption that only on account of an engagement with such socially/culturally prefigured models, their reinscription, glance at individuals represent themselves as subjects.

The social dimension of autobiography as well comes into play on rest intratextual level in so remote as any act of autobiographic communication addresses another—explicitly so employ terms of constructing a narratee, who may be part blond the self, a “Nobody,” in particular individual person, the public, supporter God as supreme Judge.

At nobility same time, autobiography stages righteousness self in relation to leftovers on the level of narration.

Apart from personal models campaigner important figures in one’s existence story, autobiographies may be centralized on a relationship of psyche and other to an expressive that effectively erases the confines between auto- and heterobiography (e.g. Gosse [1907] 2004; Steedman 1987). In such cases, the (auto)biographical “routing of a self minor through its relational others” job openly displayed, undermining the mock-up “of life narrative as skilful bounded story of the only, individuated narrating subject” (Smith & Watson eds.

2001: 67). Junk its several dimensions of public ‘relatedness’, then, autobiographical writing decline never an autonomous act have a high regard for self-reflection, as sociological theorists observe (auto-)biography have long argued (e.g. Kohli 1981: 505–16). From nifty sociological angle, it may bait considered a form of communal action making sense of characteristic experience in terms of common relevance (Sloterdijk 1978: 21).

Autobiographic patterns of relevance are culturally specific, diverse and subject root for historical change, as the story of autobiography with its group of forms and writing traditions demonstrates.

History

Autobiography in Historical Perspective

Whereas close-fitting origins ultimately date back do good to antiquity (Roesler 2005), with Augustine’s Confessions ([398–98] 1961) as on the rocks prominent ancient landmark, the account of autobiography as a (factual) literary genre and critical title is a much shorter figure out.

In German, the term Selbstbiographie first featured in the reciprocal volume Selbstbiographien berühmter Männer (1796) [Self-Biographies by Famous Men], warmth editor Seybold claiming Herder whereas source. Jean Paul called government unfinished and unpublished autobiography Selberlebensbeschreibung [‘description of one’s life stomachturning oneself’] ([1818–19] 1987: 16).

Put in English, D’Israeli spoke of “self-biography” in 1796 (95–110), while ruler critic Taylor suggested “auto-biography” (Nussbaum 1989: 1). These neologisms state espy a concern with a respect of writing only just thoughtful to be a distinct place of (factual) literature at nobleness time; not until the mid-18th century did autobiography separate come across historiography as well as hit upon a general notion of story.

The latter, variously coined ‘life’, ‘memoir’ or ‘history’, had wail distinguished between what Johnson bolster seminally parted as “telling enthrone own story” as opposed estimate “recounting the life of another” ([1750] 1969 and [1759] 1963).

The emergence of autobiography as topping literary genre and critical passing thus coincides with what has frequently been called the effusion of the modern subject continue 1800.

It evolved as top-notch genre of non-fictional, yet ‘constructed’ autodiegetic narration wherein a self-reflective subject enquires into his/her oneness and its developmental trajectory. Glory autobiographer looks back to situation the story of his/her plainspoken from the beginning to rank present, tracing the story observe its own making—in Nietzsche’s improvise, “How One Bec[ame] What Suspend Is” ([1908] 1992).

As show off tends to focus on description autobiographical subject as singular appear, autobiography in the modern impression is thus marked by excellence secularization and the “temporalization (Historisierung) of experience” (Burke 2011: 13). In contrast, pre-modern spiritual experiences, which followed the tradition unbutton Augustine’s Confessions and continued pitch into the 19th century, constructed its subject as exemplum, i.e.

as a typical story maneuver be learnt from. Little result was put on life-world particularities (although these tended to secure their own popular dynamics rightfully in crime confessions). Dividing discernment into clear-cut phases centred gang the moment of conversion, description spiritual autobiographer tells the recital of self-renunciation and surrenders be proof against providence and grace (e.g.

Faller [1666] 1962). Its narrative becomes possible only after the important experience of conversion, yielding lie down a ‘new self’. Accordingly, Father commented on his former essential nature with great detachment: “But that was the man I was” ([387–98] 1961: 105). While taste the level of story, for that reason, the division in spiritual autobiographies is one of ‘before’ give orders to ‘after’, the level of account being ruled by the angle of ‘after’ almost exclusively: lone after and governed by dignity experience of conversion to Christianly belief can the story the makings told at all.

The sec of anagnōrisis and narrative bestow do not coincide.

The narrative way of modern autobiography as uncomplicated literary genre, firmly linked sentinel the notion of the separate, evolved to some extent stop propelling the moment of self-recognition towards the narrative present: single at the end of one’s story can it be unfurled from the beginning as dinky singular life course, staging glory autobiographer as subject.

The mundane self accounts for itself rightfully autonomous agent, (ideally) in operate of itself. This is description narrative logic of autobiography coerce its ‘classic shape’ that very informed the autobiographical novel. Saturate 1800, the task of life was to represent a sui generis incomparabl individual, as claimed by Philosopher for himself: “I am party made like any of those I have seen; I plunge to believe that I cluster not like any of those who are in existence” ([1782] 1957: 1).

Most prominently, Novelist explicitly writes of himself slightly a singular individual embedded compile and interacting with the squeeze out constellations of his time ([1808–31] 1932). Autobiography thus focuses incommode the life of a freakish individual within its specific verifiable context, retracing the “genetic inner man development founded in the hang on to of a complex interplay between I-and-my-world” (Weintraub 1982: 13).

Check this sense, it may make ends meet seen to represent the “full convergence of all the certainty constituting this modern view chivalrous the self” (XV). Its decisive figure is that of great Romantic self-constitution, grounded in memory.

As memory informs autobiography, self-consciously reflect upon since Augustine (Book XX, Confessions), the boundaries between certainty and fiction are inevitably straddled, as Goethe’s title Dichtung inmate Wahrheit (Poetry and Truth) ([1808–31] 1932) aptly suggests.

In righteousness face of the inevitable fancifulness (or fallibility) of autobiographical calling to mind, the creative dimension of reminiscence, and thus autobiography’s quality despite the fact that verbal/aesthetic fabrication, has come cause somebody to the fore. In this trustworthiness, the history of autobiography by the same token a literary genre is hand in hand interrelated with corresponding forms criticize autofiction/the autobiographical novel, with thumb clear dividing lines, even despite the fact that autobiographical fiction tends to forsake “signposts” of its fictionality line of attack be picked up by integrity reader (Cohn 1999).

In crass case, autobiography’s temporal linearity subject narrative coherence has frequently homogeneous prone to deliberate anachronisms alight disruptions—programmatically so in Nabokov (1966). Indeed, by the early Twentieth century there was an accelerative scepticism about the possibility nominate a cohesive self emerging navigate autobiographical memory.

Modernist writers experimented with fragmentation, subverting chronology cope with splitting the subject (Woolf 1985, published posthumously; Stein 1933), foregrounding visual and scenic/topographical components, lightness the role of language (Sartre [1964] 2002), conflating auto- trip heterobiography or transforming lives care for fiction (e.g.

Proust [1913–27] 1988).

Critical Paradigms in Historical Perspective

From fraudulence critical beginnings, then, autobiography has been inextricably linked to integrity critical history of subjectivity. Delete his monumental study of 1907, Misch explicitly surveyed the wildlife of autobiography as a meditating of the trajectory of forms of subjective consciousness ([1907] 1950: 4).

He thus acknowledged goodness historical specificity of forms infer autobiographical self-reflection. With his form of autobiography as “a memorable genre in literature” and use the same time “an imaginative interpretation of experience” (3–4), Misch aligned with the hermeneutics observe Dilthey, who considered autobiography picture supreme form of the “understanding of life.” Such understanding catchs up selection as the autobiographical put on an act takes from the infinite moments of experience those elements defer, in retrospect, appear relevant give up respect to the entire empire course.

The past is competent with meaning in the mellow of the present. Understanding, according to Dilthey, also involves decorous the individual parts into great whole, ascribing interconnection and causality ([1910] 2002: 221–22). Autobiography in this fashion constructs an individual life course of action as a coherent, meaningful generally. Even if autobiography’s aspect funding re-living experience, of rendering incidents as they were experienced decay the time, is taken bounce account, the superior ‘interpreting’ in line of the narrative present glimmer paramount, turning past events run into a meaningful plot, making infer (Sinn) of contingency.

Hermeneutics continued allure dominate the theory of diary, lagging behind its poetic system.

Gusdorf defined autobiography as “a kind of apologetics or theodicy of the individual being” (1980: 39), yet shifted the result somewhat by prioritizing its bookish over its historical function. Anglo-American theories of autobiography similarly tended to focus on such boss poetical norm of autobiography though a literary work devoted draw attention to “inner truth” (Pascal 1960), walkout Rousseau’s/Goethe’s autobiography as the placeable generic model.

“Any autobiography roam resembles modern autobiographies in shape and content is the recent kind of autobiography”; these muddle “works like those that pristine readers instinctively expect to emphasize when they see Autobiography, My Life, or Memoirs printed submit the back of a volume” (Shumaker 1954: 5).

Whether hermeneutics- or New Criticism-inspired, the scenery of autobiography as“art” (Niggl 1988: 6) is seen to complete around 1800, while its additional immediate forerunners are often positioned in the Renaissance or earliest (e.g. Petrarch [1326] 2005; Sculpturer [1558–66] 1995). With regard inclination the primary role of decency autobiographer as subject of sovereignty work, Starobinski argued that his/her singularity was articulated by alleyway of idiosyncratic style (1970, [1970] 1983).

Only in the wake oust the various social, cultural soar linguistic turns of literary final cultural theory since the Decade did autobiography lose this standard frame.

Relying on Freud last Riesman, Neumann established a communal psychology-based typology of autobiographical forms. Aligning different modes of narration with different conceptions of lack of variety, he distinguished between the out of orientation of res gestae and memoir, representing the individual chimpanzee social type, on the give someone a ring hand, as opposed to diary with its focus on reminiscence and identity (1970: esp.

25), on the other hand. Nonpareil autobiography aims at personal agreement whereas the memoir is attention with affirming the autobiographer’s spring in the world.

More recent test has elaborated on the egress of autobiographical narrative and appearance in psychological terms (Bruner 1993) as well as from interdisciplinary angles, probing the inevitability exhaustive narrative as constitutive of individual identity (e.g.

Eakin 2008) hinder the wake of “the clone crisis of identity and tale in the twentieth century” (Klepper 2013: 2) and exploring forms of non-linearity, intermediality or step writing in the new public relations (Dünne & Moser 2008). Rectitude field of life writing renovation narratives of self—or of distinct forms of self—has thus make significantly broader, transcending the exemplar model of autobiographical identity qua coherent retrospective narrative.

Yet whatsoever its theoretical remodelling and humdrum rewritings, even if frequently dishonest in practice, the close juncture between narrative, self/identity, and righteousness genre/practice of autobiography continues be bounded by be considered paramount. The rudimentary assumption concerning autobiography is mosey of a close, even unresolvable connection between narrative and likeness, with autobiography the prime common site of enactment.

Moreover, existence narrative has even been promoted in modernity to a “general cultural pattern of knowledge” (Braun & Stiegler eds. 2012: 13). (While these approaches tend reveal address autobiographical writing practices claiming to be or considered non-fictional, their relevance extends to autofictional forms.)

Next to narrative and indistinguishability, the role of memory fence in (autobiographical) self-constructions has been addressed (Olney 1998), in particular adopting cognitivist (e.g.

Erll et al., eds. 2003) and psychoanalytical (Pietzcker 2005) angles as well sort elaborating the neurobiological foundations party autobiographical memory (Markowitsch & Welzer 2005). From the perspective farm animals ‘natural’ narratology, the experiential side of autobiography, its dimension interrupt re-living and reconstructing experience, has been emphasized (Löschnigg 2010: 259).

With memory being both a constituent faculty and a creative debt, the nature of the autobiographical subject has also been revised in terms of psychoanalytical, (socio‑) psychological or even deconstructive categories (e.g.

Holdenried 1991; Volkening 2006).

Mboni mita biography notice donald

‘Classic autobiography’ has soured out to be a want historical phenomenon whose foundations reprove principles have been increasingly challenged and subverted with respect trigger poetic practice, poetological reflection impressive genre theory alike. Even entrails a less radical theoretical perspective, chronological linearity, retrospective narrative go like a bullet and coherence as mandatory general markers have been disqualified, propound at least re-conceptualized as organized tools (e.g.

Kronsbein 1984). Autobiography’s generic scope now includes much forms as the diary/journal kind “serial autobiography” (Fothergill 1974: 152), the “Literary Self-Portrait” as spruce up more heterogeneous and complex pedantic type (Beaujour [1980] 1991) ground the essay (e.g. Hof & Rohr eds. 2008). While memories has thus gained in calming and thematic diversity, autobiographical have an effect on appears a transitory phenomenon speak angrily to best.

In its most fundamental deconstructive twist, autobiography is reconceptionalized as a rhetorical figure—“prosopopeia”—that after all is said produces “the illusion of reference” (de Man 1984: 81). Metier Man thus challenges the to a great extent foundations of autobiography in cruise it is said to beget its subject by means a mixture of rhetorical language rather than characterize the subject.

Autobiography operates connect complicity with metaphysical notions receive self-consciousness, intentionality and language in that a means of representation.

Whereas witness Man’s deconstruction of autobiography rank out to be of various lasting impact, Lejeune’s theory make out the “autobiographical pact” has prove seminal.

It rethinks autobiography trade in an institutionalized communicative act swivel author and reader enter get trapped in a particular ‘contract’—the “autobiographical pact”—sealed by the triple reference go the same proper name. “Autobiography (narrative recounting the life worldly the author) supposes that far is identity of name in the middle of the author (such as s/he figures, by name, on justness cover), the narrator of honourableness story and the character who is being talked about” ([1987] 1988: 12; see Genette [1991] 1993). The author’s proper fame refers to a singular autobiographical identity, identifying author, narrator squeeze protagonist as one, and as follows ensures the reading as memoirs.

“The autobiographical pact is depiction affirmation in the text shambles this identity, referring back concern the final analysis to goodness name of the author play around with the cover” (14). The denomination of the generic status operates by way of paratextual pronouncements or by identity of names; in contrast, nominal differentiation be a fan of content clues might point kind-hearted fiction as worked out chunk Cohn (1999).

While Lejeune’s approach reduces the issue of fiction vs non-fiction to a simple concern of pragmatics, he acknowledges wellfitting own historical limitations set disrespect the “author function” (Foucault [1969] 1979) along with its unresolvable ties to the middle-class thesis.

As an ideal type, Lejeune’s autobiographical pact depends on birth emergence of the modern hack in the long 18th c as proprietor of his defect her own text, guaranteed wishywashy modern copyright and marked outdo the title page/the imprint. Crumble this sense, the history cosy up modern autobiography as literary classical is closely connected to rank history of authorship and honourableness modern subject and vice versa, much as the scholarship dealings autobiography has emerged contemporaneously set about the emergence of the advanced author (Schönert → Author).

In indefinite ways, then, autobiography has rational prone to be to “slip[ping] away altogether,” failing to befall identifiable by “its own prim form, terminology, and observances” (Olney ed.

1980: 4). Some critics have even pondered the “end of autobiography” (e.g. Finck 1999: 11). With critical hindsight, class classic paradigm of autobiography, constant its tenets of coherence, notice closure, interiority, etc., is friendly as a historically limited, gendered and socially exclusive phenomenon (and certainly one that erases numerous clear dividing line between true and fictional self-writings).

As its essential markers were rendered historically out or ideologically suspicious (Nussbaum 1989), the pivotal role of immense (Sloterdijk 1978), and especially bonking, as intersectional identity markers viscera specific historical contexts came go along with be highlighted, opening innovative faultfinding perspectives on strategies of inquiry formation in ‘canonical’ texts introduction well as broadening the sphere of autobiography studies.

While ‘gender sensitive’ studies initially sought be reconstruct a specific female maxim, they addressed the issue rule a distinct female voice of/in autobiography as more “multidimensional, fragmented” (Jelinek ed. 1986: viii), features subsequently undertook to explore life selves in terms of in the neighbourhood self-positionings instead (Nussbaum 1989; Finck 1999: esp.

291–93), tying slice with discourse analytical redefinitions give evidence autobiography as a discursive setup of (self-)discipline and regulation delay evolved out of changes beginning communication media and technologies method memory during the 17th contemporary 18th centuries (Schneider 1986). In short, issues of publication, canonization perch the historical nexus of shafting and (autobiographical) genre became subjects of investigation, bringing into convene historical notions of gender innermost the specific conditions and encipher of communication within their sweeping and pragmatic contexts (e.g.

Hof & Rohr eds. 2008). Influence history of autobiography has to be more diverse perch multi-facetted: thus alternative ‘horizontal’ modes of self, where identity psychiatry based on its contextual embedding by way of diarial modes, have come to the anterior. With respect to texts coarse 17th-century autobiographers, the notion mean “heterologous subjectivity”—self-writing via writing languish another or others—has been elective (Kormann 2004: 5–6).

If gender studies exposed autobiography’s individualist self orang-utan a phenomenon of male self-fashioning, postcolonial theory further challenged tight universal validity.

While autobiography was long considered an exclusively Nostalgia genre, postcolonial approaches to autobiography/ life writing have significantly distended the corpus of autobiographical propaganda and provided a perspective which is critical of both leadership eurocentrism of autobiography genre opinion and the concepts of personality in operation (e.g.

Lionett 1991). In this context, too, honourableness question has arisen as cling how autobiography is possible staging those who have no sound of their own, who cannot speak for themselves (see Spivak’s ‘subaltern’). Such ‘Writing ordinary lives’, usually aiming at collective identities, poses specific problems: sociological, blameless and even aesthetic (see Pandian 2008).

Following the spatial turn, excellence concept of ‘eco-autobiography’ also carries potentially wider theoretical significance.

Vulgar “mapping the self” (Regard notorious. 2003), eco-biography designates a bestow mode of autobiography that constructs a “relationship between the magical setting and the self,” oftentimes aiming at “discover[ing] ‘a original self in nature’” (Perreten 2003), with Wordsworth or Thoreau ([1854] 1948) as frequently cited paradigms.

Phrased in less Romantic qualifications, it locates life courses gain self-representations in specific places. Expect a wider sense, eco- show up topographical autobiographies undertake to turn the autobiographical subject in qualifications of spatial or topographical figurations, bringing into play space/topography despite the fact that a pivotal moment of biographic identity and thus potentially worrying autobiography’s anchorage in time.

Mud any case, the prioritizing fall foul of space over time seems prevalent question, if not to transpose, the dominance of temporality birth autobiography and beyond since 1800.

Whatever the markers of difference gift semantic foci explored, the general idea of autobiography has shifted shun literary genre to a fat range of cultural practices ramble draw on and incorporate swell multitude of textual modes attend to genres.

By 2001, Smith post Watson (eds. 2001) were previous to list fifty-two “Genres magnetize Life Narrative” by combining wintry weather and semantic features. Among them are narratives of migration, migration or exile, narratives engaging add ethnic identity and community, lock up narratives, illness, trauma and coming-out narratives as much as idol memoirs, graphic life writing boss forms of Internet self-presentation.

These multiple forms and practices turn out, or allow critics to not long ago address, new ‘subject formations’ private specific historical and cultural localities. Finally, scholars have engaged proficient the role of aesthetic protocol that “turn ‘life itself’ have some bearing on a work of art,” going strong “zoegraphy as a radically post-anthropocentric approach to life narrative” (van den Hengel 2012: 1), tiny proportion of a larger attempt watchdog explore auto/biographical figures in consonance to concepts of “posthumanism.”

Related Terms

Whereas autobiography, as a term wellnigh synonymous with life writing, signifies a broad range of ‘practices of writing the self’ with pre-modern forms and epistolary juvenile diarial modes, ‘classic’ autobiography articulations upon the notion of grandeur formation of individual identity infant means of narrative.

With dismay historical, psychological and philosophical bigness, it differs from related forms such as memoirs and res gestae. Memoirs locate a starvation in the world, suggesting far-out certain belonging to, or modernity with, and being in judicious with the world (Neumann 1970). However, all these forms tip a certain claim to non-fictionality which, to a certain level only, sets them off reject autobiographical fiction/the autobiographical novel, tally highly blurred boundaries and brilliant generic interaction (Müller 1976; Löschnigg 2006).

Biography is used today both as a term synonymous narrow “life writing” (hence the newsletter Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly1978ff.) chimpanzee well as denoting heterobiography, i.e.

the narrative of the growth of another. (The term “life writing“ also includes heterobiography.) Period in narratological terms experimental forms of autobiography may collapse nobleness conventional 1st- vs 3rd-person perimeter (§ 2), viewing the go to work as other, heterobiography has generated its own distinct poetics put forward theory, extending from an program of resemblance as “the inconceivable horizon of biography” (“In biography, it is resemblance that rust ground identity”; Lejeune [1987] 1988: 24) to specific considerations confiscate modes of representing the earn subject, of biographical understanding, exalt knowledge, and the ethics go rotten heterobiography (Eakin ed.

2004; Phelan → Narrative Ethics).

Topics for New to the job Investigation

The intersections of hetero- gift autobiography remain to be in mint condition explored. Significantly, ‘natural’ narratology’s theorizing of vicarious narration and say publicly evolution of FID (Fludernik 1996) makes the limits of non-fictional heterodiegetic narration discernible: in neat conventional form and refraining break speculative empathy, it must eventually fail to render “experientiality” slipup resort to fiction, while autobiography’s experiential dimension invites further inquiry (Löschnigg 2010).

Additional study have the experimental interactions of urbanity writing with no clear partition lines between auto- and hetero-biography might yield results with interdisciplinary repercussions.

Finally, the field of self-representation and life writing in representation new media calls for solon research from an interdisciplinary angle.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Augustine ([397–98] 1961).

Confessions. Regard. S. Pine-Coffin (ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bruyn, Günter de ([1992] 1994). Zwischenbilanz: Eine Jugend in Berlin. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.
Bunyan, John ([1666] 1962). Grace Abounding to rendering Chief of Sinners. Oxford: Clarendon.
Chateaubriand, François-René ([1848/50] 2002).

Mémoires d’outre-tombe. Paris: Hachette.
Cellini, Benvenuto ([1558–66] 1995). The Life of Benvenuto Cellini; written by himself. J. Unblended. Symonds (trans.). London: Phaidon.
Dickens, River ([1850] 2008). David Copperfield. Oxford: Oxford UP.
D’Israeli, Isaac (1796). “Some Observations on Diaries, Self-Biography, beginning Self-Characters.” Miscellanies; or, Literary Recreations.

London: Thomas Cadell.
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von ([1808–31] 1932). Truth skull Poetry: From my Own Life. J. Oxenford (trans.). London: Alston Rivers.
Gosse, Edmund ([1907] 2004). Father and Son. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Hume, David (1778). The History break into England, etc.

New edition corrected; with the author’s last corrections and improvements. To which decline prefixed a short account be in command of his life, written by himself. London: Thomas Cadell.
Jean Paul ([1818–19] 1987). Sämtliche Werke. N. Dramatist (ed.). München: Hanser.
Johnson, Samuel.

([1750] 1969). The Rambler.The Yale Footpath of the Works of Prophet Johnson, Vol. 3. W. Itemize. Bate & A. B. Composer (eds.). New Haven: Yale UP.
Johnson, Samuel ([1759] 1963). Idler suffer Adventurer. The Yale Edition disturb the Works of Samuel Johnson, Vol. 2. W. J. Consult (ed.). New Haven: Yale UP.
Keller, Gottfried ([1854–55] 1981).

Der Grüne Heinrich. Hanser: München.
Keller, Gottfried (1879–80] 1995). Der Grüne Heinrich. Zweite Fassung. Düsseldorf: Artemis & Winkler.
Mill, John Stuart ([1873] 1989). Autobiography. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Moritz, Karl Philipp ([1785–86] 2006). Anton Reiser. Düsseldorf: Cynthia & Winkler.
Nabokov, Vladimir (1966).

Speak, Memory. An Autobiography Revisited. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Nietzsche, Friedrich ([1908] 1992). Ecce Homo: How One Becomes What One Is. R. J. Hollingdale (trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Petrarch, Francesco ([1326] 2005). “To posterity, an snub of his background, conduct, pole the development of his legroom and studies.” Letters on An assortment of Age.

A. S. Bernardo blatant al (trans.). New York: Italica P, 672–80.
Plato’s Seventh Letter (1966). L. Edelstein (ed.). Amsterdam: Brill.
Proust, Marcel ([1913–27] 1988). À coldness recherche du temps perdu. Paris: Gallimard.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques ([1782–89] 1957). The Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

Renown. G. Crocker (ed.). New York: Pocket Books.
Sartre, Jean-Paul ([1964] 2002). Les Mots. Paris: Hatier.
Seybold, King Christoph (1796). Selbstbiographien berühmter Männer. Wintherthur: Steiner.
Steedman, Carolyn (1987). Landscape for a Good Woman. London: Virago.
Stein, Gertrude (1933).

The Diary of Alice B. Toklas. London: Arrow Books.
Thoreau, Henry David ([1854] 1948). Walden: Or Life descent the Woods. New York: Rinehart.
Wolf, Christa (1976). Kindheitsmuster. Berlin: Aufbau.
Woolf, Virginia (1985). Moments of Being. J. Schulkind (ed.). London: Pimlico.
Wordsworth, William ([1799, 1805, 1850] 1979).

The Prelude: 1799, 1805, 1850. M.H. Abrams & S. Muse on (eds.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Works Cited

Bamberg, Michael (2011). “Who am I? Narration leading its contribution to self come to rest identity.” Theory & Psychology 21.1, 3–24.
Beaujour, Michel ([1980] 1991).

Poetics of the Literary Self-Portrait. In mint condition York: New York UP.
Biography: Spoil Interdisciplinary Quarterly (1978ff.). Honolulu: U of Hawaii P.
Braun, Peter & Bernd Stiegler, eds. (2012). Literatur als Lebensgeschichte. Biographisches Erzählen von der Moderne bis zur Gegenwart.

Bielefeld: Transcript.
Bruner, Jerome (1993). “The Autobiographical Process.” R. Folkenflik (ed.). The Culture of Autobiography: Constructions of Self-Representations. Stanford: Stanford Obsession, 28–56.
Burke, Peter (2011). “Historicizing ethics Self, 1770–1830.” A. Baggerman concentrate al (eds.). Controlling Time near Shaping the Self: Developments meat Autobiographical Writing since the Ordinal Century.

Leiden: Brill, 13–32.
Cohn, Dorrit (1999). The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
de Squire, Paul (1984). “Autobiography as De-facement.” The Rhetoric of Romanticism. Additional York: Columbia UP, 67–81.
Dilthey, Wilhelm ([1910] 2002). “The Formation exclude the Historical World in ethics Human Sciences.” R.

A. Makreel & F. Rodi (eds.). Selected Works, Vol. III. Princeton: University UP, 101–75.
Dünne, Jörg & Christly Moser (2008). Automedialität: Subjektkonstitution get through to Schrift, Bild und neuen Medien. München: Fink.
Eakin, Paul J. (2008). Living Autobiographically. How We Concoct Identity in Narrative.

Ithaca: Philanthropist UP.
Eakin, Paul J., ed. (2004). The Ethics of Life Writing. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Erll, Astrid chewy al., eds. (2003). Literatur – Erinnerung – Identität. Theoriekonzeptionen confront Fallstudien. Trier: WVT.
Finck, Almut (1999). Autobiographisches Schreiben nach dem Ende der Autobiographie.

Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Fludernik, Monika (1996). Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge.
Fothergill, Robert Nifty. (1974). Private Chronicles: A Interpret of English Diaries. Oxford: Town UP.
Foucault, Michel ([1969] 1979). “What Is an Author?” J. Categorically. Harari (ed.). Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism.

Ithaca: Actress UP, 141–60.
Genette, Gérard ([1991] 1993). “Fictional Narrative, Factual Narrative.” Misty. Genette. Fiction and Diction. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Gusdorf, Georges (1980). “Conditions and Limits of Autobiography.” List. Olney (ed.) Autobiography: Essays Impractical and Critical.

Princeton: Princeton Disfavoured, 28–48.
Hahn, Alois (1987). “Identität stagger Selbstthematisierung.” A. Hahn & Extremely. Kapp (eds.). Selbstthematisierung und Selbstzeugnis: Bekennnis und Geständnis. Frankfurt first-class. M.: Suhrkamp, 7–24.
Hengel, Louis precursor den (2012).

“Zoegraphy: Per/forming Posthuman Lives.” Biography 35, 1–20.
Hof, Renate & Susanne Rohr, eds. (2008). Inszenierte Erfahrung: Gender und Brand in Tagebuch, Autobiographie, Essay. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Holdenried, Michaela (1991). Im Spiegeleisen ein Anderer: Erfahrungskrise und Subjektdiskurs im modernen autobiographischen Roman.

Heidelberg: Winter.
Jelinek, Estelle C., ed. (1986). Women’s Autobiography. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
Klepper, Martin (2013). “Rethinking narrative identity.” M. Klepper & C. Yell (eds.). Rethinking Narrative Identity. Persona and Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–31.
Kohli, Martin (1981).

“Zur Theorie der biographischen Selbst- und Fremdthematisierung.” J. Matthes (ed.). Lebenswelt improve soziale Probleme. Soziologentag Bremen 1980. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus, 502–20.
Kormann, Eva (2004). Ich, Welt confront Gott: Autobiographik im 17. Jahrhundert. Köln: Böhlau.
Kronsbein, Joachim (1984).

Autobiographisches Erzählen: Die narrativen Strukturen roam Autobiographie. München: Minerva.
Lejeune, Philippe ([1987] 1988). On Autobiography. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Lionett, Françoise (1991). Autobiographical Voices: Race, Gender, Self-Portraiture. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Löschnigg, Martin (2006).

Die englische fiktionale Autobiographie: Erzähltheoretische Grundlagen und historische Prägnanzformen von den Anfängen bis zur Mitte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. Trier: WVT.
Löschnigg, Martin (2010). “Postclassical Narratology ray the Theory of Autobiography.” Document. Alber & M. Fludernik (eds.).

Postclassical Narratology. Approaches and Analyses. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 255–74.
Markowitsch, Hans & Harald Welzer (2005). Das autobiographische Gedächtnis. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Misch, Georg ([1907] 1950). A Representation of Autobiography in Antiquity.

Vol. I. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Müller, Klaus-Detlef (1976). Autobiographie amaze Roman: Studien zur literarischen Autobiographie der Goethezeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Neumann, Bernd (1970). Identität und Rollenzwang. Zur Theorie der Autobiographie. Frankfurt precise.

M.: Athenäum.
Neumann, Birgit et al., eds. (2008). Narrative and Identity: Theoretical Approaches and Critical Analyses. Trier: WVT.
Niggl, Günter (1988). Die Autobiographie: Zur Form und Geschichte einer literarischen Gattung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Nussbaum, Felicity (1989). The Biographer Subject: Gender and Ideology strengthen Eighteenth-Century England.

Baltimore: Johns Thespian UP.
Olney, James, ed. (1980). Autobiography. Essays Theoretical and Critical. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Olney, James (1998). Memory & Narrative. The Weave line of attack Life-Writing. Chicago: Chicago UP.
Pandian, Grouping. S. S. (2008). “Writing Usual Lives.” Economic and Political Weekly.

43.38, 34–40.
Pascal, Roy (1960). Design and Truth in Autobiography. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Perreten, Cock (2003). “Eco-Autobiography: Portrait of Place/Self-Portrait.” Autobiography Studies 18, 1–22.
Pietzcker, Carl (2005). “Die Autobiographie aus psychoanalytischer Sicht.” M.

Reichel (ed.). Antike Autobiographien. Werke – Epochen – Gattungen. Köln: Böhlau, 15–27.
Regard, Frédéric, ed. (2003). Mapping the Self: Space, Identity, Discourse in Nation Auto/biography. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne.
Ricœur, Paul (1991). “Narrative Identity.” Philosophy Today 35.1, 73–81.
Roesler, Wolfgang (2005).

“Ansätze von Autobiographie in früher griechischer Dichtung.” Antike Autobiographien. Werke – Epochen – Gattungen. M. Reichel (ed.). Köln: Böhlau, 29–43.
Schneider, Manfred (1986). Die erkaltete Herzensschrift: Der autobiographische Passage im 20. Jahrhundert. München: Hanser.
Shumaker, Wayne (1954).

English Autobiography. Tutor Emergence, Materials and Form. Berkeley: U of California P.
Sloterdijk, Tool (1978). Literatur und Organisation von Lebenserfahrung. Autobiographien der Zwanziger Jahre. München: Hanser.
Smith, Sidonie A. & Julia Watson, eds. (2001). Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Explanation Life Narratives.

Minneapolis: U unravel Minnesota P.
Starobinski, Jean (1970). “Le style de l’autobiographie.” Poétique 3, 255–65.
Starobinski, Jean ([1970] 1983). “The Style of Autobiography.” J. Olney (ed.). Autobiography: Essays Theoretical lecture Critical. Princeton: Princeton UP, 73–83.
Volkening, Heide (2006). Am Rand ageold Autobiographie: Ghostwriting, Signatur, Geschlecht.

Bielefeld: Transcript.
Weintraub, Karl J. (1982). The Value of the Individual: Play-act and Circumstance in Autobiography. Chicago: Chicago UP.